Avicus Archive

Debate: one V.S. Three chances by legendary_wolf25 January 11, 2015 at 9:01 PM UTC

When people are being annoying in chat mods normally give them a kick then if they continue a temp ban then a bigger temp ban and then a full ban.do you think this is good? Or do you think they should get less chances? 2 chances? One chance? More chances? Post your opinion bellow with some good backup facts.have fun in this debate don't get frustrated over it it is just for fun and to see other people's opinions!

lactify January 11, 2015 at 11:01 PM UTC

Yes, they need to learn from their mistakes.

chaibrit1 January 11, 2015 at 11:01 PM UTC

I think the way it is now is good. One verbal warning, then a kick.

AutoHit January 11, 2015 at 11:01 PM UTC

A verbal warning and a kick works most of the time, unless the person continues to not learn their mistake. Or, a /warn instead of a verbal warning then a kick.

kycrafft January 12, 2015 at 12:01 AM UTC

Verbal warning
(Second if needed)
Kick
Kick or hour tempban
Tempban
Longer tempban

Thats how I'd do it. Depends on the duration in between infractions, though.

legendary_wolf25 January 12, 2015 at 12:01 AM UTC

But why? Why do you guys think it should take as many chances as you think it should take. Support your ideas with facts, and plz debate it with other people in here that is what I made this discotion for.

kycrafft January 12, 2015 at 12:01 AM UTC

But why? Why do you guys think it should take as many chances as you think it should take. Support your ideas with facts, and plz debate it with other people in here that is what I made this discotion for.
There needs to be a medium between instantly banning everyone and giving people 50 chances. But it also depends on the severity of the harassment.