Why Team Allah is in the Invitationals
by
DonaldMyTrump
December 7, 2016 at 1:12 PM UTC
Howdy,
The top three records out of group B were Labradoodles 4-0-1 (4th win assumed because Labradoodles wasn't allowed to play HOME but HOME went win-less otherwise) Cennet 4-1-0 Team Allah 3-1-1
After the match a member of Labradoodles was told in chat not to log off by Tazz. The player was not frozen. Tazz then moved our player into the screensharing room and was having him download join.me. Tazz at this point said "Ok thanks bye" and our player logged off minecraft. Here's the issue. Our player was being screenshared for an autoclicker and was told he was. Tazz also said "Ok thanks bye" to make it seem like the screensharing was over. Autoclickers can be deleted without closing minecraft so the fact that he closed minecraft is inconsequential to our DQ.
However Tazz justified it anyways claiming that the autoclicker detector had registered him at 31 cps (surprisingly not regularly considering it was an "autoclicker"). Tazz then demanded that our player prove that he could click at 31 cps. When our player only managed 15 cps Tazz took this as him autoclicking. However, as confirmed by ALM former developer the clicks a player has can be packeted due to lag and therefore register as much higher than they actually are and without other proof or a ridiculously high cps on a lagless suspect it does not qualify as evidence.
When this was brought to their attention, conveniently the officials many of whom are on Team Allah (including Tazz) decided that it was illegal for us to have players who were sharing accounts. We however had asked the refs and officials earlier if we were allowed to do this and were given this response. https://cdn.pbrd.co/images/5tBab5ZhA.png The Officials are just allowing Team Allah through due to bias. If you want to win the tourney try winning group stages Allah.
Note: Some officials, refs and other various staff members have been useful and fair in this process I appreciate these ones and would like to commend them on their efforts to maintain a sense of fairness in these tournaments. https://gyazo.com/dcc2a4bc97513e2488bee6a0da6ee6b4
A member of my team sent it to me, PieZ does not deny that he said it, but he claims that the ref who asked the question messed up the question so that it said something else. However both PieZ and the ref confirm that it was their mistake not ours that led to this confusion.
A member of my team sent it to me, PieZ does not deny that he said it, but he claims that the ref who asked the question messed up the question so that it said something else. However both PieZ and the ref confirm that it was their mistake not ours that led to this confusion.
That message is in referee chat, so none of your team members are supposed to see that
Tazz at this point said "Ok thanks bye" and our player logged off minecraft.
Incorrect. You have your order of events wrong lol, this is the main reason he is banned and you are dqed. It came to my attention that he had logged off, and he had - 2 minutes ago. At this time, I was telling Pie to ban him, because he had logged off which comes under refusing to screenshare, and also failure to follow an officials instruction. Your argument that autoclickers can be deleted is true, yes, however it does have something to do with his ban. Not sure if you know zac, but autoclickers are actually in clients as well, which he could have been using. Please stop changing the situation and story, you weren't there :)
Tazz at this point said "Ok thanks bye" and our player logged off minecraft.
Incorrect. You have your order of events wrong lol, this is the main reason he is banned and you are dqed. It came to my attention that he had logged off, and he had - 2 minutes ago. At this time, I was telling Pie to ban him, because he had logged off which comes under refusing to screenshare, and also failure to follow an officials instruction. Your argument that autoclickers can be deleted is true, yes, however it does have something to do with his ban. Not sure if you know zac, but autoclickers are actually in clients as well, which he could have been using. Please stop changing the situation and story, you weren't there :)
You're right, I wasn't there. But luckily you were, someone who has nothing to gain from us being DQ'd and is completely trustworthy right? Lol the fact that someone who gets into invitationals if we get DQ'd did the ss in the first place should be enough to reverse this decision. The only reason we're DQ'd is because you can't win a tourney without cheating.
You're right, I wasn't there. But luckily you were, someone who has nothing to gain from us being DQ'd and is completely trustworthy right? Lol the fact that someone who gets into invitationals if we get DQ'd did the ss in the first place should be enough to reverse this decision. The only reason we're DQ'd is because you can't win a tourney without cheating.
No, you're DQed for 3 reasons actually. 1 is a mistake on our behalf, correct, but the rule set still has your answer. Piez's answer could have been taken 2 ways, and you took it as if you could.
You weren't there. There are 2 people who were there, piez honestly has nothing do to with allah. He's friends with us yes, but I'm also friends with Jig, and Budah.
The fact is, officials shouldn't be allowed to play, and refs for that matter, however, can bias ever be prevented in a community where everybody knows each other well?
The fact is, officials shouldn't be allowed to play, and refs for that matter, however, can bias ever be prevented in a community where everybody knows each other well?
am i wrong or was ginie head of tournaments on bl but still played?
The fact is, officials shouldn't be allowed to play, and refs for that matter, however, can bias ever be prevented in a community where everybody knows each other well?
okay then if the people who manage the tournaments cant play, the people who make the maps cant play.
Its common sense. Why should players who aren't on the roster be allowed to play? If these tournaments were at some public place, you wouldn't be able to switch accounts or any of that crap. You would play with whoever you had available and is on the roster. It's like two teams switching accounts so they can win one match which benefits.
Its common sense. Why should players who aren't on the roster be allowed to play? If these tournaments were at some public place, you wouldn't be able to switch accounts or any of that crap. You would play with whoever you had available and is on the roster. It's like two teams switching accounts so they can win one match which benefits.
That is undeniable. However, the event staff gave the Labradoodles an answer that strongly implied that such actions are allowed, so the team cannot be fully held responsible.
The fact is, officials shouldn't be allowed to play, and refs for that matter, however, can bias ever be prevented in a community where everybody knows each other well?
Now listen pussies, don't complain about being hard done by the tournament. Tourney 1, DQ'ed because of 1 player using togglesneak that had poor and unspecified rules. Tourney 2 broken map with no FUCKING BOUNDARIES NICE ONE AVICUS that loses a game and is not punished in a final
You're right, I wasn't there. But luckily you were, someone who has nothing to gain from us being DQ'd and is completely trustworthy right? Lol the fact that someone who gets into invitationals if we get DQ'd did the ss in the first place should be enough to reverse this decision. The only reason we're DQ'd is because you can't win a tourney without cheating.
Now listen pussies, don't complain about being hard done by the tournament. Tourney 1, DQ'ed because of 1 player using togglesneak that had poor and unspecified rules. Tourney 2 broken map with no FUCKING BOUNDARIES NICE ONE AVICUS that loses a game and is not punished in a final
Now listen pussies, don't complain about being hard done by the tournament. Tourney 1, DQ'ed because of 1 player using togglesneak that had poor and unspecified rules. Tourney 2 broken map with no FUCKING BOUNDARIES NICE ONE AVICUS that loses a game and is not punished in a final
At least you actually had someone using togglesneak. We got DQ'd for eliminating allah
Its common sense. Why should players who aren't on the roster be allowed to play? If these tournaments were at some public place, you wouldn't be able to switch accounts or any of that crap. You would play with whoever you had available and is on the roster. It's like two teams switching accounts so they can win one match which benefits.
Even Tazz admits the account thing was a mistake of theirs, so idk why you're arguing that point. Anyways, its common sense that the account must be pre-registered not the actual person. It is a reasonable rule but when we're told its allowed by tourney staff it is also reasonable that we wouldn't follow it.
No, you're DQed for 3 reasons actually. 1 is a mistake on our behalf, correct, but the rule set still has your answer. Piez's answer could have been taken 2 ways, and you took it as if you could.
You weren't there. There are 2 people who were there, piez honestly has nothing do to with allah. He's friends with us yes, but I'm also friends with Jig, and Budah.
Lol PieZ disagrees with you doing it too. The second he banned Axhal he poked me saying "I only did the ban"
The second way being I have an account registered but I want to play on my friend's account? I think that excuse is a bit ridiculous there is one way to understand it given our question.
Lol PieZ disagrees with you doing it too. The second he banned Axhal he poked me saying "I only did the ban"
The second way being I have an account registered but I want to play on my friend's account? I think that excuse is a bit ridiculous there is one way to understand it given our question.
PieZ is on the team lol. Not like Jig or Budah.
But nothing affects him lol. He's not on the roster, why wouid be care.
The fact is, officials shouldn't be allowed to play, and refs for that matter, however, can bias ever be prevented in a community where everybody knows each other well?
Always supported this, but the fact is that barely anyone apart from a few people will be committed to solely officiating or reffing a tournament. No one cares enough anymore.
Always supported this, but the fact is that barely anyone apart from a few people will be committed to solely officiating or reffing a tournament. No one cares enough anymore.
Sli was promoted to be in charge of maps, and you seemed dedicated. But then all you cared about was playing, even when we had no one on to run match day.
Edit: Not saying you were a bad choice, iirc you did help a lot internally.
Sli was promoted to be in charge of maps, and you seemed dedicated. But then all you cared about was playing, even when we had no one on to run match day.
Edit: Not saying you were a bad choice, iirc you did help a lot internally.
literally said when i got promoted i would play and you were fine with it
Then there is something wrong with the way you run the Official team. Any event staff playing should not be involved in any decision making. I understand that you have little other choices, but this really shouldn't be the way you run tournaments.
The title of the post is why Team Allah is in the invitationals, not why labradoodles isn't in.
If we beat cennet (which we would have, we didn't have 3 of our best players there and our leader wasn't there either) we would still be in.
Also apparently sosastyle or w/e his name is, is a known cheater on OCN
No lol the only people who thinks he hacks are yirang. Ever wonder why he's not banned on ocn? Or do you just think avicus staff are so damn good at detecting hacks they caught him in a few hours?
Why allow the people who make the maps ahead of time play? They basically know everything about them before everyone else.
Map making and knowing how to play it are very different things. A map maker usually will only have a basic idea of how the map will be played and one that everyone else can match by simply viewing the map.
No lol the only people who thinks he hacks are yirang. Ever wonder why he's not banned on ocn? Or do you just think avicus staff are so damn good at detecting hacks they caught him in a few hours?
Then there is something wrong with the way you run the Official team. Any event staff playing should not be involved in any decision making. I understand that you have little other choices, but this really shouldn't be the way you run tournaments.
1. Officials got an indication that someone was cheating. That CPS detector isn't accurate, but at the same time, it does give an indication of who could be sketchy. 2. Tazz isn't 100% sure that the guy is hacking, so he decides to play it safe and screenshare him. 3. Guy logs off, clearly breaking screenshare rules 4. Guy gets banned
I have no clue where the "Tazz biased the desicion to get into invitationals" attitude came from. Your player clearly disobeyed an official, regardless of what team he is on. I'm not on Allah, I don't give a fuck if they make it or not, but your player clearly broke the rules.
"If they aren't banned on OCN, they don't cheat" attitude - Nice meme
I don't even know why there is a debate over this, this isn't a conflict of interest, this is a clear rule infringement.....
No lol the only people who thinks he hacks are yirang. Ever wonder why he's not banned on ocn? Or do you just think avicus staff are so damn good at detecting hacks they caught him in a few hours?
OCN isn't exactly known for catching closet cheaters lol
Not hard to get away with cheating at all on OCN - darkinferno link
No lol the only people who thinks he hacks are yirang. Ever wonder why he's not banned on ocn? Or do you just think avicus staff are so damn good at detecting hacks they caught him in a few hours?
Wait.. Officials and Refs are allowed to play in the tournament?
That doesn't make any sense, they run the tournament, that'll lead to bias if they play.
I thought we talked about this problem after the 1st tournament, isn't this tournament number 4?
Just talked about this in slack. They ones playing wouldn't have to make the decisions if all 8 officials were active. Only two were online at this time.. that is the main problem which was discussed.
1. Officials got an indication that someone was cheating. That CPS detector isn't accurate, but at the same time, it does give an indication of who could be sketchy. 2. Tazz isn't 100% sure that the guy is hacking, so he decides to play it safe and screenshare him. 3. Guy logs off, clearly breaking screenshare rules 4. Guy gets banned
I have no clue where the "Tazz biased the desicion to get into invitationals" attitude came from. Your player clearly disobeyed an official, regardless of what team he is on. I'm not on Allah, I don't give a fuck if they make it or not, but your player clearly broke the rules.
"If they aren't banned on OCN, they don't cheat" attitude - Nice meme
I don't even know why there is a debate over this, this isn't a conflict of interest, this is a clear rule infringement.....
Ok Ok, this doesn't need to get complicated....
I assume by this you mean we don't have to acknowledge any of the details but if you read the post there is an explanation as to where the Tazz bias comes from and how our player didn't disobey officials but was mislead by Tazz.
"If they aren't banned on OCN, they don't cheat" attitude - Nice meme
Context is important, I sent this to DGB because he said he was a well known hacker on ocn but is only banned here. DGB has a history of false bans here making his faith in avicus staff all of a sudden very shocking.
I don't even know why there is a debate over this, this isn't a conflict of interest, this is a clear rule infringement.....
Yes, well you clearly haven't read the full post or you would know why there is a debate over it
okay then if the people who manage the tournaments cant play, the people who make the maps cant play.
what the fuck lol? how does that even make any sense could come up with the same argument saying youre media and you shouldnt be allowed toi play makes no sense as well
we dont try to hide some secret shit in our maps like you probably think, if you study and practice the map well enough before the tourney trust me youd know exactly what i know and maybe even more than the creator of the map
Just talked about this in slack. They ones playing wouldn't have to make the decisions if all 8 officials were active. Only two were online at this time.. that is the main problem which was discussed.
Then you postpone the decision, and wait for more to get online. It's really simple.
1. Officials got an indication that someone was cheating. That CPS detector isn't accurate, but at the same time, it does give an indication of who could be sketchy. 2. Tazz isn't 100% sure that the guy is hacking, so he decides to play it safe and screenshare him. 3. Guy logs off, clearly breaking screenshare rules 4. Guy gets banned
I have no clue where the "Tazz biased the desicion to get into invitationals" attitude came from. Your player clearly disobeyed an official, regardless of what team he is on. I'm not on Allah, I don't give a fuck if they make it or not, but your player clearly broke the rules.
"If they aren't banned on OCN, they don't cheat" attitude - Nice meme
I don't even know why there is a debate over this, this isn't a conflict of interest, this is a clear rule infringement.....
For someone to set it off 5 times in 5 minutes who is not lagging when being spectated, it is accurate.
I'm not totally sure where you got bias from... He was asked to ss and left. The only thing that I kind of understand is when Tazz says "bye" you can probably take that as "Okay, you're clean.", but in all honesty, if you know that if you leave in the middle of the ss, before they have even looked at anything... I would have at least asked. At least say something like "We're done?" then wait for a response. The fact that he just left almost is enough to say that he wanted to leave because he had a client somewhere, or that he was nervous. It's not normal for someone to ask to ss you then just say "Okay, you're good, thanks." That doesn't make much sense at all...
Not replying to anyone in specific, this is going to be general.
The standard (in terms of rules) for competitive PvP servers is if you log out of Minecraft when asked to ss, you get banned. The fact is that though (if I got the person right, this is off the small amount of posts I've read) I doubt Sosa cheats, clients with built-in autoclickers are a reality as well. Closing MC = instant ban on ANY server that supports screensharing, everyone knows that. You can't blame anyone else but the player who didn't think before acting. I won't speculate about whether the given player was in fact cheating or not, but still breaking the rules should deserve punishment. The match the player left in should've been replayed saying that. There is no solid evidence of that player cheating at all. ALM saying the autoclicker detector was wrong sometimes renders the little evidence that was there useless. Moving on, last tournament account sharing was also illegal and led to UbeR being DQ'd. I don't know about the grey area here because I don't think Axhal would have even played on that account during the tournament, but I could be wrong. I mean, if no one outside the registered players were playing in that match given the circumstances I explained, just either replay the match or let it go.
I'll explain the 'OK thanks bye' shit when I get home lol.
Lol. The 'ok thanks bye' is literally irrelevant. We were in the room for probably 9 minutes. Around the 5th, someone poked me saying that Axhal had logged off. At this stage I checked, and I msged PieZ telling him to ban him. I asked Axhal why he logged off. He said he had to so he could download join.me - which is complete bullshit by the way lmao. I said he'd be getting banned, piez banned him, I said 'ok thanks bye'. He still wasn't on join.me, about 9 minutes after I sent him the link, which is fishy in itself lmao.
what the fuck lol? how does that even make any sense could come up with the same argument saying youre media and you shouldnt be allowed toi play makes no sense as well
we dont try to hide some secret shit in our maps like you probably think, if you study and practice the map well enough before the tourney trust me youd know exactly what i know and maybe even more than the creator of the map
well no, you see that's when the ignorance comes in play. Officials make game decisions so people think they shouldn't be able to play Map makers make the maps so they know flaws and cons about the maps, higher advantage some people think Medias stream the matches so we cant play??? wow much logic.
I'm not against map makers playing, nor am I against officials. But an argument can be made about map makers too.
well no, you see that's when the ignorance comes in play. Officials make game decisions so people think they shouldn't be able to play Map makers make the maps so they know flaws and cons about the maps, higher advantage some people think Medias stream the matches so we cant play??? wow much logic.
I'm not against map makers playing, nor am I against officials. But an argument can be made about map makers too.
Can be made but it would make no sense since officials take decisions about what they think and you can analyse the map and get strats exactly like i can, you get the map on scrim servers before the tourney so you could analyze it and do whatever and break every single block if you think were hiding some shit lolo
Can be made but it would make no sense since officials take decisions about what they think and you can analyse the map and get strats exactly like i can, you get the map on scrim servers before the tourney so you could analyze it and do whatever and break every single block if you think were hiding some shit lolo
whilst tazz is slightly retarded it seems like BS that sosastyle was told ok bye considering he was in ts for 10 mins
Sosa is a retard too it took him 10 minutes to download join.me and the thing is Tazz still screenshared him after all this hoping to catch him autoclicking.
I'm not totally sure where you got bias from... He was asked to ss and left. The only thing that I kind of understand is when Tazz says "bye" you can probably take that as "Okay, you're clean.", but in all honesty, if you know that if you leave in the middle of the ss, before they have even looked at anything... I would have at least asked. At least say something like "We're done?" then wait for a response. The fact that he just left almost is enough to say that he wanted to leave because he had a client somewhere, or that he was nervous. It's not normal for someone to ask to ss you then just say "Okay, you're good, thanks." That doesn't make much sense at all...
Lol. The 'ok thanks bye' is literally irrelevant. We were in the room for probably 9 minutes. Around the 5th, someone poked me saying that Axhal had logged off. At this stage I checked, and I msged PieZ telling him to ban him. I asked Axhal why he logged off. He said he had to so he could download join.me - which is complete bullshit by the way lmao. I said he'd be getting banned, piez banned him, I said 'ok thanks bye'. He still wasn't on join.me, about 9 minutes after I sent him the link, which is fishy in itself lmao.
lol sosa is fishy for not being on join.me in 10 minutes, clearly justified ban and DQ
Not replying to anyone in specific, this is going to be general.
The standard (in terms of rules) for competitive PvP servers is if you log out of Minecraft when asked to ss, you get banned. The fact is that though (if I got the person right, this is off the small amount of posts I've read) I doubt Sosa cheats, clients with built-in autoclickers are a reality as well. Closing MC = instant ban on ANY server that supports screensharing, everyone knows that. You can't blame anyone else but the player who didn't think before acting. I won't speculate about whether the given player was in fact cheating or not, but still breaking the rules should deserve punishment. The match the player left in should've been replayed saying that. There is no solid evidence of that player cheating at all. ALM saying the autoclicker detector was wrong sometimes renders the little evidence that was there useless. Moving on, last tournament account sharing was also illegal and led to UbeR being DQ'd. I don't know about the grey area here because I don't think Axhal would have even played on that account during the tournament, but I could be wrong. I mean, if no one outside the registered players were playing in that match given the circumstances I explained, just either replay the match or let it go.
When I have nothing better to do in class ^^^
Yes, the issue I have is not with Sosa being banned for leaving. The problem I have is that the screenshare was botched purposely by an official who directly stands to benefit from us being DQed. As far as the account sharing goes, we were told by event staff we were allowed to do it and therefore that is not our fault.
Yes, the issue I have is not with Sosa being banned for leaving. The problem I have is that the screenshare was botched purposely by an official who directly stands to benefit from us being DQed. As far as the account sharing goes, we were told by event staff we were allowed to do it and therefore that is not our fault.
If you have evidence of that then send it, because last event I know it wasn't.
I can agree i don't like the idea of an official who was playing conducting the screen share.
Even if you want to trust and believe and officials are not bias it's still abit controversial and general and should be a no-go.
Officials decision at the end of the day but they should 100% learn from this even if they themselves think they can justify it. If there's too much outcry - like this. Then there's certainly something to be improved on , i think we can all agree.
Lol. The 'ok thanks bye' is literally irrelevant. We were in the room for probably 9 minutes. Around the 5th, someone poked me saying that Axhal had logged off. At this stage I checked, and I msged PieZ telling him to ban him. I asked Axhal why he logged off. He said he had to so he could download join.me - which is complete bullshit by the way lmao. I said he'd be getting banned, piez banned him, I said 'ok thanks bye'. He still wasn't on join.me, about 9 minutes after I sent him the link, which is fishy in itself lmao.
Yes, the issue I have is not with Sosa being banned for leaving. The problem I have is that the screenshare was botched purposely by an official who directly stands to benefit from us being DQed. As far as the account sharing goes, we were told by event staff we were allowed to do it and therefore that is not our fault.
If you have evidence of that then send it, because last event I know it wasn't.
Yes, there is evidence of that KIND of being said. It isn't allowed. Piez worded the question incorrectly, which can be taken two ways, as in if both accounts are registered (which piez meant) or the account that will be played on is registered.
Yes, there is evidence of that KIND of being said. It isn't allowed. Piez worded the question incorrectly, which can be taken two ways, as in if both accounts are registered (which piez meant) or the account that will be played on is registered.
Tazz your pov was first person against a team that beat you (i think im correct i dont watch tms anymore neither do i play) the fact that you were then allowed to judge the player after LOSING isnt correct, your mindset even if you dont admit it, will be bias towards thinking that he hacked because he just beat you. Instead of tazz doing it there should be other officials ready to look at him without tazz's input, as he would add bias to it. Even if he means it or not.
Tazz your pov was first person against a team that beat you (i think im correct i dont watch tms anymore neither do i play) the fact that you were then allowed to judge the player after LOSING isnt correct, your mindset even if you dont admit it, will be bias towards thinking that he hacked because he just beat you. Instead of tazz doing it there should be other officials ready to look at him without tazz's input, as he would add bias to it. Even if he means it or not.
remy wtf u talking about lol
we drew to them second game
after 4th game i ssed him cos he set off like 5 alerts in the 5 minutes i was on?
Tazz your pov was first person against a team that beat you (i think im correct i dont watch tms anymore neither do i play) the fact that you were then allowed to judge the player after LOSING isnt correct, your mindset even if you dont admit it, will be bias towards thinking that he hacked because he just beat you. Instead of tazz doing it there should be other officials ready to look at him without tazz's input, as he would add bias to it. Even if he means it or not.
This is true but if someone leaves a ss it's an automatic ban and their team gets DQ'd. That's what happened. There's no bias. I don't understand what everyone is talking about...
This is true but if someone leaves a ss it's an automatic ban and their team gets DQ'd. That's what happened. There's no bias. I don't understand what everyone is talking about...
He botched the SS though... You just appear to be content at ignoring this for whatever reason though and over simplifying it to: player leaves ss so ban
ikr im so bias for banning someone who dced before a ss:c
No, you're biased for: -taking the SS in the first place -botching it and banning anyways -trying to come up with an alternate reason to DQ us -being official and playing in a tourney that you continue to work on -Screensharing Sosa after he disconnected from minecraft and then declaring that since he can't click 31 cps he was using an autoclicker :)
No, you're biased for: -taking the SS in the first place -botching it and banning anyways -trying to come up with an alternate reason to DQ us -being official and playing in a tourney that you continue to work on -Screensharing Sosa after he disconnected from minecraft and then declaring that since he can't click 31 cps he was using an autoclicker :)
-taking the SS in the first place was asked to by my fellow official
-botching it and banning anyways you've still failed to tell me how I 'botched' the screenshare
-trying to come up with an alternate reason to DQ us all are valid reasons actually
-being official and playing in a tourney that you continue to work on that itself doesn't make me bias
-Screensharing Sosa after he disconnected from minecraft and then declaring that since he can't click 31 cps he was using an autoclicker actually the screenshare was quite irrelevant, just wanted to see if he could actually click anywhere around 18+. nowhere was I testing for 31.
-taking the SS in the first place was asked to by my fellow official
-botching it and banning anyways you've still failed to tell me how I 'botched' the screenshare
-trying to come up with an alternate reason to DQ us all are valid reasons actually
-being official and playing in a tourney that you continue to work on that itself doesn't make me bias
-Screensharing Sosa after he disconnected from minecraft and then declaring that since he can't click 31 cps he was using an autoclicker actually the screenshare was quite irrelevant, just wanted to see if he could actually click anywhere around 18+. nowhere was I testing for 31.
ill add a smiley face here too :)
was asked to by my fellow official cool so you and that official both messed up
you've still failed to tell me how I 'botched' the screenshare Saying "Ok thanks bye", not having him frozen, not giving specific instructions
all are valid reasons actually lol nope
that itself doesn't make me bias it does
actually the screenshare was quite irrelevant, just wanted to see if he could actually click anywhere around 18+. nowhere was I testing for 31. just SSed for shits and giggles right?
was asked to by my fellow official cool so you and that official both messed up
you've still failed to tell me how I 'botched' the screenshare Saying "Ok thanks bye", not having him frozen, not giving specific instructions
all are valid reasons actually lol nope
that itself doesn't make me bias it does
actually the screenshare was quite irrelevant, just wanted to see if he could actually click anywhere around 18+. nowhere was I testing for 31. just SSed for shits and giggles right?
:))
Saying "Ok thanks bye", not having him frozen, not giving specific instructions i've literally replied to you thrice about why i said that are you just taking the piss or ignoring me lol
Saying "Ok thanks bye", not having him frozen, not giving specific instructions i've literally replied to you thrice about why i said that are you just taking the piss or ignoring me lol
Oh dear Lord... This thread is a bomb waiting to explode if it hasn't already.
Zac- I think just based on what you clearly didn't read, or are ignoring the point of this thread is to hate on Tazz.
Tazz- You probably shouldn't have taken the ss, but I think you realize that now.
I'm going to lock this because it's going to become a flame war, and the post is pretty much directed at a specific person to hurt/effect them in some way.
Locking...
This website is an archive of data gathererd by Avicus Network LLC between the years of 2013 and 2017
Copyright Ⓒ 2012-2017 Avicus Network LLC. All Rights Reserved