[SUG] League roster sizes
by
Spoookeh
January 4, 2016 at 10:01 AM UTC
I'd like to suggest having the roster sizes for the League Season 2 the max they can be (30) just because it's a league and spans about 12 weeks. Because of this, not everyone will be able to attend and different people will want to play. Leaders might find it difficult to tell players that they won't be able to play for their team for a pretty long time.
I think it would be great, as for the thing Pel mentioned, why it be a problem to have 30 people on the roster, as long as only 6-8 showed up during the matches.
Roster sizes are 20. You play with 8. Tbh, I don't care that you have too many players on your roster. If you haven't realized. the sizes for T1 and T2 were 18.Now it is 20. It's not my fault that you have a gigantic roster when the sizes for the first two tournaments were 18. Furthermore, the ratio for players on field to roster sizes is 2.5. That is very big. I (no, i'm not leaking, this is my opinion) want the roster sizes for tournament 3 to be less than 18.
Roster sizes are 20. You play with 8. Tbh, I don't care that you have too many players on your roster. If you haven't realized. the sizes for T1 and T2 were 18.Now it is 20. It's not my fault that you have a gigantic roster when the sizes for the first two tournaments were 18. Furthermore, the ratio for players on field to roster sizes is 2.5. That is very big. I (no, i'm not leaking, this is my opinion) want the roster sizes for tournament 3 to be less than 18.
This is a league yo. Also, that seems really dictator like.. Do you officials not talk with each other? : P two have said it's cool, but you're killing the dream. THE DREAM IS OVER TAZZ ITS OVER!!
The hardest part of entering a tournament with a limit is telling a member of your team that they cannot play. The simplest way of getting rid of this problem is to remove the limit. The officials need to be more mindful of the teams, and the team leaders. It would be very easy just to increase the player count by 5 or maybe even 10 - a lot easier than telling a player that they cannot play in the league.
Roster sizes are 20. You play with 8. Tbh, I don't care that you have too many players on your roster. If you haven't realized. the sizes for T1 and T2 were 18.Now it is 20. It's not my fault that you have a gigantic roster when the sizes for the first two tournaments were 18. Furthermore, the ratio for players on field to roster sizes is 2.5. That is very big. I (no, i'm not leaking, this is my opinion) want the roster sizes for tournament 3 to be less than 18.
I dont really mind the limit on the tournaments but it's ridiculous for the League, imo that is.
Tournaments need a cap of 18 or so. The league should have a very high cap of say 25-30, due to the nature of games being played weekly or bi weekly, you need back ups for back ups. You can then have maybe 3-4 portions of the seasons which are in effect like transfer windows - but maybe on 3 transfers or so, so teams dont change too much.
This is a league yo. Also, that seems really dictator like.. Do you officials not talk with each other? : P two have said it's cool, but you're killing the dream. THE DREAM IS OVER TAZZ ITS OVER!!
Noono, of course we do. You took it the wrong way. That is what I would personally want xd
Roster sizes are 20. You play with 8. Tbh, I don't care that you have too many players on your roster. If you haven't realized. the sizes for T1 and T2 were 18.Now it is 20. It's not my fault that you have a gigantic roster when the sizes for the first two tournaments were 18. Furthermore, the ratio for players on field to roster sizes is 2.5. That is very big. I (no, i'm not leaking, this is my opinion) want the roster sizes for tournament 3 to be less than 18.
But I think if New BC had more than 18 active players you'd want it raised :^)
My point is, you do not need 12 backups. You need to field 6 people, 8 at max. The minimum has a 3.33. ratio. That is very high which I do think you realise. 12 backups is already way too high. If you have 20, active members (unlike myself xd) then you should not have a problem fielding 8. The two most active teams have 10ish players on a matchday.
The hardest part of entering a tournament with a limit is telling a member of your team that they cannot play. The simplest way of getting rid of this problem is to remove the limit. The officials need to be more mindful of the teams, and the team leaders. It would be very easy just to increase the player count by 5 or maybe even 10 - a lot easier than telling a player that they cannot play in the league.
You shouldn't have such a high roster number in the first place. 20 is way too big in itself.
You shouldn't have such a high roster number in the first place. 20 is way too big in itself.
if there is a roster limit to 30 then the tournament roster limit should be 30. Also T1 abd T2 were about 4 or 5 matches max. The League is 13 matches.
if there is a roster limit to 30 then the tournament roster limit should be 30. Also T1 abd T2 were about 4 or 5 matches max. The League is 13 matches.
I really have no idea how you can think that, or why there is a limit on a roster. The roster limit should be unlimited, however please give me a valid reason as to why the tournament roster limit should be 30.
I really have no idea how you can think that, or why there is a limit on a roster. The roster limit should be unlimited, however please give me a valid reason as to why the tournament roster limit should be 30.
It should be 30 because it is a league, not a tournament. In a league, everyone is meant to play and participate for the team. I'd understand why the tournament roster for an actual tournament might not be 30 but this is not the case. All the players in the team should be able to play in matches and feel part of team. How'd you like it if you were excused from a league because of another player? You may think it is a tournament but because of the layout of this, it is a league.
It should be 30 because it is a league, not a tournament. In a league, everyone is meant to play and participate for the team. I'd understand why the tournament roster for an actual tournament might not be 30 but this is not the case. All the players in the team should be able to play in matches and feel part of team. How'd you like it if you were excused from a league because of another player? You may think it is a tournament but because of the layout of this, it is a league.
If I was excused then I would go and find another team and improve? Like I said above, people shouldn't have more than 20 people in their team who are active and who play, because they know that they will have to 'excuse' them for the tournament.
If I was excused then I would go and find another team and improve? Like I said above, people shouldn't have more than 20 people in their team who are active and who play, because they know that they will have to 'excuse' them for the tournament.
What is the point of making team leaders' excuse players? As I said, it is a league, not a tournament.
If I was excused then I would go and find another team and improve? Like I said above, people shouldn't have more than 20 people in their team who are active and who play, because they know that they will have to 'excuse' them for the tournament.
But we arent OCN. Why cant we try and implement new player caps? They are trying 5v5, why dont we try making it higher? Having more people on field would be SO MUCH more interesting than the current 8v8. What people are suggesting, is that you make the LEAGUE either 30 or 25 players because its a League.... In a tournament sure, let the roster be 18. Its a tournament, you only take your best players (thats how it works). Also, you are allowed to have more than 18/20 players. A team is supposed to be your friends, so what if you have more than 20? As long as you have fun as a group its still a team. Having to tell people to stop playing and leave is terrible. You would know this. The fact that Avicus has larger teams than OCN is one thing, however, we have so many fewer teams. Making a team on Avicus is not easy. If all the excess on apollo was to leave that would be 4 players.... What if they can't find any friends to play with, because they are all on Apollo?
But we arent OCN. Why cant we try and implement new player caps? They are trying 5v5, why dont we try making it higher? Having more people on field would be SO MUCH more interesting than the current 8v8. What people are suggesting, is that you make the LEAGUE either 30 or 25 players because its a League.... In a tournament sure, let the roster be 18. Its a tournament, you only take your best players (thats how it works). Also, you are allowed to have more than 18/20 players. A team is supposed to be your friends, so what if you have more than 20? As long as you have fun as a group its still a team. Having to tell people to stop playing and leave is terrible. You would know this. The fact that Avicus has larger teams than OCN is one thing, however, we have so many fewer teams. Making a team on Avicus is not easy. If all the excess on apollo was to leave that would be 4 players.... What if they can't find any friends to play with, because they are all on Apollo?
I think that the fact that the league is over such a long period of time compared to the tournaments, means that I should be raised. People in a tourney are picked because they're the best in your team. You play a couple of matches over 2-3 weeks and then its over. With a league it disables people to play competitively over a long period of time.
But we arent OCN. Why cant we try and implement new player caps? They are trying 5v5, why dont we try making it higher? Having more people on field would be SO MUCH more interesting than the current 8v8. What people are suggesting, is that you make the LEAGUE either 30 or 25 players because its a League.... In a tournament sure, let the roster be 18. Its a tournament, you only take your best players (thats how it works). Also, you are allowed to have more than 18/20 players. A team is supposed to be your friends, so what if you have more than 20? As long as you have fun as a group its still a team. Having to tell people to stop playing and leave is terrible. You would know this. The fact that Avicus has larger teams than OCN is one thing, however, we have so many fewer teams. Making a team on Avicus is not easy. If all the excess on apollo was to leave that would be 4 players.... What if they can't find any friends to play with, because they are all on Apollo?
The fact that Avicus has larger teams than OCN is one thing, however, we have so many fewer teams.
If we upped the count then there would be less. We currently have what, 10 teams? I want to lower it to 8v8 with 16-18, but if I did that then people would complain that people have to leave. However, that would make making teams a lot easier, and we could probably get 16 team tournaments instead of 8, like last tournament which is pathetic.
What if they can't find any friends to play with, because they are all on Apollo? Then they can make a team together or something? They could maybe take some members from Apollo.
Roster sizes are 20. You play with 8. Tbh, I don't care that you have too many players on your roster. If you haven't realized. the sizes for T1 and T2 were 18.Now it is 20. It's not my fault that you have a gigantic roster when the sizes for the first two tournaments were 18. Furthermore, the ratio for players on field to roster sizes is 2.5. That is very big. I (no, i'm not leaking, this is my opinion) want the roster sizes for tournament 3 to be less than 18.
Please Avicus, don't copy OCN and go 5v5, at least see how it works out for OCN first...
Avicus doesn't currently have maps to support 5v5s / 6v6s anyway. Even if it would happen, it would take a while.
This website is an archive of data gathererd by Avicus Network LLC between the years of 2013 and 2017
Copyright Ⓒ 2012-2017 Avicus Network LLC. All Rights Reserved